Comments on: Why Canada Sucks http://absurd.onlookers.net Of, relating to, or manifesting the view that there is no order or value in human life or in the universe. Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:23:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-1624 Onlooker Sun, 30 May 2010 02:58:18 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-1624 Akalia, The reality is most other countries(with seal populations) kill the seals also, as they breed like rabbits. Only they are 'culls', and everything is wasted. In Canada the fur, and meat is used(ie: not wasted). Not to mention the whole notion is arbitrary, the value of a cute seal vs an ugly pig(One of the smartest animals), or calf/chicken. Akalia, The reality is most other countries(with seal populations) kill the seals also, as they breed like rabbits. Only they are ‘culls’, and everything is wasted. In Canada the fur, and meat is used(ie: not wasted).

Not to mention the whole notion is arbitrary, the value of a cute seal vs an ugly pig(One of the smartest animals), or calf/chicken.

]]>
By: Akalia Henriet http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-1621 Akalia Henriet Wed, 26 May 2010 16:37:48 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-1621 The seals, come on people! Don't forget that Canada kills tens of thousands of baby seals a year! Innocent, helpless baby seals! think about it, it's like lkilling puppies. Senseless and wrong!!!! The seals, come on people! Don’t forget that Canada kills tens of thousands of baby seals a year! Innocent, helpless baby seals! think about it, it’s like lkilling puppies. Senseless and wrong!!!!

]]>
By: Onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-1606 Onlooker Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:11:08 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-1606 Young offenders acts hides peoples names from the press and makes it illegal to name criminals for fear they might be persecuted later in life(That should be the least of their problems). 16 year old immigrant(kick him and his family out) stabs a 20 year old in chest in his car for 'looking at him funny' as the brat walks by. Gets 10 days in jail and eventually let off with time served/probation. Reference: <a href="http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9016218.html" rel="nofollow">http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9016218.html</a> <a href="http://absurd.onlookers.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/10DaysAttemptedMurder.mht" rel="nofollow">Backup</a> Young offenders acts hides peoples names from the press and makes it illegal to name criminals for fear they might be persecuted later in life(That should be the least of their problems). 16 year old immigrant(kick him and his family out) stabs a 20 year old in chest in his car for ‘looking at him funny’ as the brat walks by. Gets 10 days in jail and eventually let off with time served/probation. Reference: http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9016218.html Backup

]]>
By: onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-1364 onlooker Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:43:45 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-1364 Canada requires a radio license to use Marine VHF radio. "subject to a $5,000 fine and up to 12 months in jail for use without a Maritime Restricted Radio Operator's Certificate". Yet our neighbors to the south know better and no licensing is required for 300 million of their citizens, without I might add any significant problems. Also when Americans visit or boat in Canadian waters they are not required to have a license themselves, which only punishes the locals. ie: More burden/cost/bull shit for being Canadian. Canada requires a radio license to use Marine VHF radio. “subject to a $5,000 fine and up to 12 months in jail for use without a Maritime Restricted Radio Operator’s Certificate”.
Yet our neighbors to the south know better and no licensing is required for 300 million of their citizens, without I might add any significant problems.

Also when Americans visit or boat in Canadian waters they are not required to have a license themselves, which only punishes the locals.

ie: More burden/cost/bull shit for being Canadian.

]]>
By: swarfrat http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-992 swarfrat Sat, 23 May 2009 00:06:43 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-992 Canada could have had it all! American Technology. British Culture. French Cuisine. Instead they got the worst of it all. French Technology. British Cuisine. American Culture. Canada could have had it all! American Technology. British Culture. French Cuisine. Instead they got the worst of it all. French Technology. British Cuisine. American Culture.

]]>
By: Onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-989 Onlooker Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:53:01 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-989 Canada even regulates what you can call your business: "The Partnership Business Name Registration Act (the act that governs partnership/sole proprietorships and business names) requires both distinction and description. A name submitted for registration under that act will be rejected if it does not somehow contain both description and a clear distinction." %uc$ing fascists. This means you can't call your business "Spots" or "Whatever" unless you add a description "Spots Shoes" "Whatever Investments". To name a company "Mcdonalds" or "Google" you would have to trademark the name, increasing naming costs by about 7x(yearly). Canada even regulates what you can call your business: “The Partnership Business Name Registration Act (the act that governs partnership/sole proprietorships and business names) requires both distinction and description. A name submitted for registration under that act will be rejected if it does not somehow contain both description and a clear distinction.”
%uc$ing fascists. This means you can’t call your business “Spots” or “Whatever” unless you add a description “Spots Shoes” “Whatever Investments”. To name a company “Mcdonalds” or “Google” you would have to trademark the name, increasing naming costs by about 7x(yearly).

]]>
By: Onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-982 Onlooker Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:13:07 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-982 <a href="http://thechronicleherald.ca/print_article.html?story=9011278" rel="nofollow">Reference</a>. So basically year(s) in jail for self defence? Who broke into whos place? Ho hum... Reference. So basically year(s) in jail for self defence? Who broke into whos place? Ho hum…

]]>
By: Rc http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-975 Rc Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:23:34 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-975 Canadians rock but are government and the systems are just messed up and not managed properly Canadians rock but are government and the systems are just messed up and not managed properly

]]>
By: knightrd http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-150 knightrd Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:09:33 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-150 Just wait to see what is in store for 2009. -An American Just wait to see what is in store for 2009. -An American

]]>
By: onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-87 onlooker Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:52:03 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-87 Lobster fishing licenses are only for commercial fishers, and a citizen can not fish and eat any lobsters for themselves. The reason the government gives, is to control stock, but in Maine, citizens can get personal licenses and fish for their own supper, with no apparent effects on stock. IMO Citizens should have the right OVER commerical fishers. Don't even get me started on wtf Canada did to "help" the COD stocks. Lobster fishing licenses are only for commercial fishers, and a citizen can not fish and eat any lobsters for themselves. The reason the government gives, is to control stock, but in Maine, citizens can get personal licenses and fish for their own supper, with no apparent effects on stock.

IMO Citizens should have the right OVER commerical fishers. Don’t even get me started on wtf Canada did to “help” the COD stocks.

]]>
By: onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-40 onlooker Tue, 13 May 2008 06:22:05 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-40 Canadian businesses are often given monopolies, for example propane companies in Nova Scotia(maybe elsewhere?) are allowed to not sell you propane unless it is in a tank they own/lease you. $120+- a year for the tank to hold propane that you buy (at greatly inflated prices from taxes). That really adds up, figuring a propane tank costs at the MOST $500 new, 20 year life of a tank thats $1900 per household they can extort. Canadian businesses are often given monopolies, for example propane companies in Nova Scotia(maybe elsewhere?) are allowed to not sell you propane unless it is in a tank they own/lease you. $120+- a year for the tank to hold propane that you buy (at greatly inflated prices from taxes). That really adds up, figuring a propane tank costs at the MOST $500 new, 20 year life of a tank thats $1900 per household they can extort.

]]>
By: onlooker http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-39 onlooker Sun, 11 May 2008 18:47:03 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-39 How about most of the homes in Atlantic Canada are heated by foreign oil, when the natural gas(sabel island) that could be used to heat the maritimes for centuries is being sold and piped THROUGH Canada directly to the states(at no real benefit to citizens). How about most of the homes in Atlantic Canada are heated by foreign oil, when the natural gas(sabel island) that could be used to heat the maritimes for centuries is being sold and piped THROUGH Canada directly to the states(at no real benefit to citizens).

]]>
By: Another Reason http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7&cpage=1#comment-3 Another Reason Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:55:56 +0000 http://absurd.onlookers.net/?page_id=7#comment-3 In canada you must build to <a href="http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/codes/nrcc47666_e.html" rel="nofollow">National Building Code of Canada 2005</a> specifications which the government makes themselves and charges you $190 for paperback $350 for digital version of the information... So your tax money pays so they can enforce and make rules, then the government charges you for access to the rules. eMule has .pdf versions of Volume 1 & 2 for download. If your money paid to make it, is it wrong to possess a copy yourself? In canada you must build to National Building Code of Canada 2005 specifications which the government makes themselves and charges you $190 for paperback $350 for digital version of the information… So your tax money pays so they can enforce and make rules, then the government charges you for access to the rules.

eMule has .pdf versions of Volume 1 & 2 for download. If your money paid to make it, is it wrong to possess a copy yourself?

]]>